- #How to install libgcc 3.4.6 sol9 sparc local how to
- #How to install libgcc 3.4.6 sol9 sparc local install
- #How to install libgcc 3.4.6 sol9 sparc local software
Ƒ The length and the complexity of the Œrewall ruleset. This rule is not set in stone and will depend on several other factors, but it is a good starting point. Assuming that the network interfaces you are using can handle the speed the networks work at, you can be certain that a 100MHz Pentium can cope with 10Mbps of trafŒc. The speed of the Œrewall machine must be enough to keep up with the fastest of them, otherwise your Œrewall will be loosing you plenty of money in unused, but paid for, bandwidth. The faster they are, the more packets they'll move per second. Ƒ The speed of the networks that the Œrewall is connected to. Just how many CPU cycles your Œrewall machine will need depends on several factors: Packet Œlters implemented on top of a general-purpose operating system require more power, though not as much as many other pieces of networking software. For example, a certain very famous manufacturer of packet Œlters and routers uses Motorola 680x0 CPUs running at 20MHz! They are plenty enough for a packet Œlter, because they run in an environment optimized for that particular task. Unlike 3D graphics, or other math-intensive tasks, bossing TCP packets around requires relatively little processor power. An even better BIOS design may use passwords to block Ctrl+Alt+Del keys, the reset key, or even the power switch. A good BIOS ought to allow the administrator to protect access to its settings with a password.
#How to install libgcc 3.4.6 sol9 sparc local install
#How to install libgcc 3.4.6 sol9 sparc local how to
To Œnd out how to subscribe to them, visit the Mailing Lists page: If you are interested in exploring this subject further, the latest list of supported architectures can be found on the OpenBSD Platforms page:Īnother good place to ask for help are the misc and ports mailing lists. Conversely, a decommissioned 300MHz Alpha workstation might be just the right thing. Running OpenBSD on an ancient Apple Macintosh with a Motorola 680x0 CPU does have a certain `geek' appeal, but using even the fastest of them as a packet Œlter on a high-speed link is not a good idea. You should note though that not all hardware architectures may be suitable for your needs. Security through diversity is a good practice.
#How to install libgcc 3.4.6 sol9 sparc local software
This is not to say that there are no weak points in other hardware architectures, but their lower popularity means that there are not so many people actively looking for them and writing software tools that exploit them. This is less of an issue for a standalone, tightly secured Œrewall, but if you were running aĭNS or web server on the same machine that you run your Œrewall on (not a good security practice, but unavoidable at times), then simply switching to another platform would make such server less vulnerable to those attacks that exploit the weaknesses in the i386 architecture. Maintaining hardware platforms diversity is a good security practice, because the majority of rogue software that targets hardware is written with the i386 architecture in mind. Later, when you are comfortable with using OpenBSD in production environment, you should consider other hardware architectures, not because it is cool, but because it is highly advisable for security reasons. It is recommended for Œrst-time users of OpenBSD, because most people use it and there is much greater chance of Œnding a helping hand when things go wrong with the hardware/operating system interactions.
Installing OpenBSD, then the obvious choice is i386, aka.